RT @JulieLeask: @UlliEcker Adding to this too https://t.co/S2mI8T2lsv
RT @fabiovelo: another nail in the zombie backfire effect coffin. consistent with our findings addressing vaccine misinformation and myths…
RT @fabiovelo: another nail in the zombie backfire effect coffin. consistent with our findings addressing vaccine misinformation and myths…
RT @fabiovelo: another nail in the zombie backfire effect coffin. consistent with our findings addressing vaccine misinformation and myths…
another nail in the zombie backfire effect coffin. consistent with our findings addressing vaccine misinformation and myths @marykesteffens @adamgdunn @DanchinMargie @JulieLeask @hwitteman https://t.co/IbCBUpF6KH
RT @JulieLeask: @UlliEcker Adding to this too https://t.co/S2mI8T2lsv
@UlliEcker Adding to this too https://t.co/S2mI8T2lsv
Vaccine myth agreement among 454 parents of 0-5 year olds (in Australia) reduced by posing headlines about 3 childhood vaccination myths as questions (v. control). Not much agreement change detected by just repeating or correcting the myth (v. control).
@m4changeco FYI, there was a recent study that came out that shows the opposite, which is worth checking out. Perhaps there are contexts in which the myth-fact format is effective. https://t.co/6am4TObhAk
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
More evidence that mythbusting health info doesn't cut it. The days of myth/fact are over. Just lazy and non-evidence based comms otherwise. Hopefully mainstream our media and journalists will stop using this approach too.
Good read on addressing misinformation about childhood vaccination with evidence on the effectiveness of various debunking strategies & how different text-based debunking strategies affect parents’ agreement with vaccination myths and their intention
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
This research challenges previous studies and says that in fact, it's okay to use the myth/fact format to debunk misinformation. Truth is, I do like that format for conveying info, but avoid it because of research that said it can backfire by reinforcing m
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
Really great! Thank you
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
RT @JulieLeask: Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experim…
Repeating a vaccination myth before correcting it does not appear to increase people's agreement with the myth. Our experiment now online in Pediatrics. Great work from @marykesteffens' PhD research, with @adamgdunn @fabiovelo @DanchinMargie @hwitteman htt
great to see this important study appear online. huge congratulations @marykesteffens. feel humbled to be part of an all-star cast including @adamgdunn @DanchinMargie @hwitteman & @JulieLeask
Addressing myths and vaccine hesitancy: a randomized trial https://t.co/9Mls4r57yl work led by @marykesteffens with help from @fabiovelo; robust work in a relevant population with some very neat practical implications
Addressing #VaccineMyths and #VaccineHesitancy: A Randomized Trial Maryke S Steffens, MD, et al. @Macquarie_Uni https://t.co/28XPyASHkJ #Pediatrics https://t.co/u1oS8AoOuE
Addressing Myths and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Randomized Trial | American Academy of Pediatrics https://t.co/1GbvA9yHxC
This newly released study compares the effect of repeating vaccination myths and other text-based debunking strategies on parents' agreement with myths and their intention to vaccinate their children. Read the full study here: https://t.co/t1YLMVEhTj #Pedi