RT @Dierenbach: And even though the mask mandate has done nothing to slow the spread and has only fomented anger, Polis will never back awa…
🤡If these horror-clowns at @AmerAcadPeds stopped treating the public with such absolute f***ing contempt, perhaps this oh-so-mysterious cratering of trust in their advice might not be such an issue? What the f*** is wrong with you people? https://t.co/uO
RT @doc_gero: 🤡If these horror-clowns at @AmerAcadPeds stopped treating the public with such absolute f***ing contempt, perhaps this oh-so/…
🤡If these horror-clowns at @AmerAcadPeds stopped treating the public with such absolute f***ing contempt, perhaps this oh-so/mysterious cratering of trust in their advice might not be such an issue? What the f*** is wrong with you people? https://t.co/uO
@Marcova14819724 La fonte, cioè lo studio a cui si fa riferimento, è questo. Basta cercare, le cose si trovano 😉 https://t.co/51dv3hCNGE
RT @AhHonings: @hansvantelling Het is ethisch ongepast om '#borstvoeding' als natuurlijke voeding te omschrijven omdat de term rigide opvat…
@hansvantelling Dat artikel vermeldt een onderzoek in ‘Pediatrics’. daar zou dat verband gelegd worden. Geen toegang… https://t.co/PK5hUZh9oH
Unintended Consequences of Invoking the “Natural” in Breastfeeding Promotion https://t.co/jMxjwu3BPX https://t.co/hqaTN4hJu1
@crab_bart Dit ‘onderzoek’ heeft als onderliggende motivatie dat ‘natuurlijk’ niet teveel mag propageren, want dan zouden moeders minder mee willen werken aan vaccinatieprogramma’s. https://t.co/4jJMUcK72q
@hansvantelling Het is ethisch ongepast om '#borstvoeding' als natuurlijke voeding te omschrijven omdat de term rigide opvattingen over #genderrollen afdwingt De natuur koppelen aan het moederschap is 'onethisch' https://t.co/KqcUz1RASi https://t.co/Le07
@mofetrol Dit is de studie en die zegt niets over "gender roles." https://t.co/vvJXfp6kL4
RT @JorJorWell: "Study: Describing Breastfeeding as ‘Natural’ Is Unethical Because It Reinforces Gender Roles" Study (2016) was in 'Pediat…
RT @r2d2arm: @jasonetheridge I wouldn't trust a website that is clearly leaning in a certain direction. The abstract for the paper (unfort…
@CasuallyGreg Had a quick search on seeing this and it's from 2017 with a link to the study. Seems the authors were concerned that opting for breastfeeding would make mother's anti vaccine or some such waffle https://t.co/pfe4GTiNdw
@JohnTuld1 La riflessione di Jessica Martucci del 2016, interessante, ma senza conseguenze da quando l'ha scritta. https://t.co/5UQFeISTo6
@blochamok Til dem der tror at dette meme er misinformation: https://t.co/rQieQQ3epA
@covid_parent The 2017 article in the original tweet critiques this 2016 paper by saying the authors are clearly biased and make unconvincing claims. Having read both articles, I agree with their assessment. See for yourself the Martucci and Barnhill pape
"Study: Describing Breastfeeding as ‘Natural’ Is Unethical Because It Reinforces Gender Roles" Study (2016) was in 'Pediatrics' (journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics) whose byline says: "Dedicated To The Health Of All Children" https://t.co/QBlUt
@jasonetheridge I wouldn't trust a website that is clearly leaning in a certain direction. The abstract for the paper (unfortunately full version behind paywall) doesn't seem to mention gender roles at all. https://t.co/Ebu72yESTl
Welkom in een wereld op zijn kop die voornamelijk gedomineerd wordt door illusies en fucked up brains 🙃
@BartemyS This is the original article on pubmed, https://t.co/GdzckzkCl6
Goedeavond Twitter zielen & Genen met een gat of aanhangsel Ik mocht vandaag mega crimineel zijn. Als echtgenote & moeder mocht ik lekker huiselijk op deze druilerige dag een zak rode bieten, een flinke rode kool en appels inslaan op de markt en m
#WO3extremisme BIO-feminisme en KINDERGENEESKUNDE "Het is ethisch ongepast om 'borstvoeding' als natuurlijke voeding te beschrijven omdat de term rigide opvattingen over #genderrollen afdwingt De natuur koppelen aan het moederschap is 'onethisch' https
@CasuallyGreg Read the Pediatrics paper https://t.co/zOPPmOYNzZ There is no mention of gender, trans people or any other of those topics. The authors criticize using the word “natural” as if all things “natural” are good and “non-natural” are bad.
@Hitchcock322 @backtolife_2023 Here's the link to the paper quoted in the article. https://t.co/1z3Nml7Bvf
@CasuallyGreg From 2016. "Promoting BFing as 'natural' may be ethically problematic & may bolster belief that 'natural' approaches are healthier. May ultimately challenge PH’s aims in other contexts" That's creepy. Feels bit like, "HOW DARE YOU think
@bommthecat אחרי זה, אני לא מופתעת https://t.co/tNzoS4iwdl
@TheFitFunFam1 Because of this https://t.co/tGPNW1kMWl
@DPlatevoet For the sceptics: CNN https://t.co/pprjaki3VE SLATE https://t.co/EAHFTYctkr NIH https://t.co/g3l45eR56c
@ezralevant Here’s a clue behind the mindset. https://t.co/euXBKqMizy
@Jikkyleaks This may ultimately challenge public health’s aims in other contexts, particularly childhood vaccination. https://t.co/euXBKqMizy
@Jikkyleaks They have been preparing for this... https://t.co/0AO8Ctcgs5
@Saikmedi From the APP: https://t.co/Y0zt5fcGyf https://t.co/FW6YieSzNB
@alfredianslip @streamgazer Found it here. But cannot access the full article unfortunately. https://t.co/DjRNsEVeMg
RT @Taximom4ever: @DrJamesOlsson Remember this? https://t.co/NZ1eyC2s51
@DrJamesOlsson Remember this? https://t.co/NZ1eyC2s51
World gone insane long ago 🤮https://t.co/y7B1S60XSN
Unintended Consequences of Invoking the “Natural” in Breastfeeding Promotion https://t.co/HjqfDLsEJe THIS IS #NATURAL. What are they going to take from us next? 💯 % believe that feed is best but #breastfeeding is one of the many things that I am proud of!
@CasuallyGreg Is the AAP like, for real? https://t.co/AJVXqP3xKT
RT @ImBack_Patriot: What am I missing here? 🤣 The comments in the Pediatrics publication are priceless! https://t.co/vDvE9DUqrp https://t…
RT @ImBack_Patriot: What am I missing here? 🤣 The comments in the Pediatrics publication are priceless! https://t.co/vDvE9DUqrp https://t…
Unintended Consequences of Invoking the “Natural” in Breastfeeding Promotion | Pediatrics | American Academy of Pediatrics https://t.co/QoMv1GTFrH
RT @ImBack_Patriot: What am I missing here? 🤣 The comments in the Pediatrics publication are priceless! https://t.co/vDvE9DUqrp https://t…
RT @ImBack_Patriot: What am I missing here? 🤣 The comments in the Pediatrics publication are priceless! https://t.co/vDvE9DUqrp https://t…
RT @ImBack_Patriot: What am I missing here? 🤣 The comments in the Pediatrics publication are priceless! https://t.co/vDvE9DUqrp https://t…
RT @ImBack_Patriot: What am I missing here? 🤣 The comments in the Pediatrics publication are priceless! https://t.co/vDvE9DUqrp https://t…
What am I missing here? 🤣 The comments in the Pediatrics publication are priceless! https://t.co/vDvE9DUqrp https://t.co/FxRnZCvOBc
@melbournite_ @BernieSpofforth Here's one of them. Dated 2016. A run around Google should track the others. https://t.co/KDObroZN8Z
RT @squillionsblog: @BernieSpofforth The unintended consequences of believing every young adult has something to gain from a University edu…
@BernieSpofforth The unintended consequences of believing every young adult has something to gain from a University education. PHD = Politically Hashed Doctrine or Pharma Housed Dissertation. https://t.co/MWJ56OYhNC
@soetsappies Both authors of that paper are feminists who are primarily butthurt about the possibility of breastfeeding promotion destroying their stupid feminist ideology about gender roles https://t.co/L0BBwajF9V The fact that this comes from the numbe
On the American Association of Pediatrics website, by a PhD no less. "Promoting breastfeeding as “natural” may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that “natural” approaches are presumptively healthier." https:
Unintended Consequences of Invoking the “Natural” in Breastfeeding Promotion - Jessica Martucci, PhD; Anne Barnhill, PhD (Apr 2016) https://t.co/4Cac7FwkIc
@callmeHailey_1 @Tl84189427 מזכיר לי את זה... https://t.co/MN5In1leHy
RT @straymagnet1: @CIcAda3301_01 Here's the article. Two PhD bat crap crazy Dingbats actually wrote it! https://t.co/vnnbcciTqZ
@CIcAda3301_01 Here's the article. Two PhD bat crap crazy Dingbats actually wrote it! https://t.co/vnnbcciTqZ
משהו חדש. עדיף לא להגיד על הנקה שהיא טבעית, כי זה יוצר אנטי חיסונים לצאת נגד כל חוקי הטבע, למען המדע. https://t.co/Ec2UpKAfpt
@SarahKRybka @rejectthegreat1 @backtolife_2022 Written in 2016 see https://t.co/uMD0MCFs7n and comments are good.
RT @pofeng: 太強調 "自然" 的母奶最好, 在美國(?)可能還會有助長反疫苗的副作用 https://t.co/Tp06iWCzW6
太強調 "自然" 的母奶最好, 在美國(?)可能還會有助長反疫苗的副作用 https://t.co/Tp06iWCzW6
@jaapnuijt86 @Jetconneqt Artikel uit 2016 van The American Association of Psychiatrists. Originele link: https://t.co/nnbE91GI0Q
@alphatucana Never mind...found it. https://t.co/mILJ42WWfS
Oh, it’s real! https://t.co/5Kj2WU7bhE
@eaken It's an excerpt from this: https://t.co/YmDHeHyD9d
RT @DavidBellamyUK: The New Natural in a #BuildBackBetter world?
RT @DavidBellamyUK: The New Natural in a #BuildBackBetter world?
RT @DavidBellamyUK: The New Natural in a #BuildBackBetter world?
RT @DavidBellamyUK: The New Natural in a #BuildBackBetter world?
RT @DavidBellamyUK: The New Natural in a #BuildBackBetter world?
It is amazing that the AAP had any credibility left to lose. How was it that it took 5 years for them to fully lose it after espousing this garbage in 2016? https://t.co/rZ1I5db6ZN https://t.co/yw4hu2EoGl
RT @LouWood27875164: Er,not fake😞 these people are insane 'https://t.co/G2o7SVCuxQ' https://t.co/VEkHxl3R0u
Er,not fake😞 these people are insane 'https://t.co/G2o7SVCuxQ' https://t.co/VEkHxl3R0u
RT @postpostpostr: @VividVoid_ @streamgazer https://t.co/1gC4fZUKNi found the article, use your favorite site to access
Sauce: https://t.co/cQuuM8POaH
@DrClaytonForre1 From 2016. Shows how long they’ve been at this dual position. https://t.co/FUkjnHJaX6
@VividVoid_ @streamgazer https://t.co/1gC4fZUKNi found the article, use your favorite site to access
@theoldmaiden Here is a link to the whole paper https://t.co/gmRLbef37A
Elle sait pas lire l’anglais. Et m’envoie une étude qui le confirme.
La science aux mains des débiles https://t.co/MYK7eXlNqi Il faut être bien naïf pour ne pas voir l'arnaque, la promotion de la vaccination vs la promotion de l'allaitement. Quand on connaît ses bienfaits sur l'immunité...
@Ahava67 En effet. La "science" actuelle, c'est du grand n'importe quoi. https://t.co/dFCw0H5coh
@gabybelg Tiens, j'te laisse l'étude "scientifique". Lis-la au lieu de me dire d'apprendre à lire. (Les gens qui se pensent bin hot à me cracher dessus, pouvez-vous aller exposer votre vide intérieur ailleurs que sur mon profil?) https://t.co/dFCw0GNAZH
@00rettiwT Random? J'ai pris la peine de mettre la source... C'est malheureusement la "science" qui raconte de telles bêtise. Revoici l'étude en question. Pour y trouver de l'ignorance crasse, va sur le profil de #Legault. Vive la science! https://t.co/dF
@y_bon_homme C'est malheureusement "sérieux", dans le sens que c'est une "étude scientifique" qui arrive à cette conclusion de MARDE. Vive la science! https://t.co/dFCw0H5coh
@LabrieMathieu1 C'est pas juste un article... c'est une étude scientifique!!!! Sans joke. https://t.co/dFCw0H5coh
RT @TheSignificant5: @Rebel_Heart77 @FlatEarthCity These must be the same people that have a problem with calling breastfeeding natural. h…
They've weaponized the word "natural" in an attempt to bastardize God's creation. https://t.co/zQg4LOVHe4
@Rebel_Heart77 @FlatEarthCity These must be the same people that have a problem with calling breastfeeding natural. https://t.co/zQg4LOVHe4
RT @DerorCurrency: 'Science'. "Promoting breastfeeding as “natural” may be ethically problematic". Why? Because it "may ultimately chall…
RT @DerorCurrency: 'Science'. "Promoting breastfeeding as “natural” may be ethically problematic". Why? Because it "may ultimately chall…