↓ Skip to main content

American Academy of Pediatrics

Article Metrics

Addressing Myths and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Addressing Myths and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Randomized Trial
Published in
Pediatrics, October 2021
DOI 10.1542/peds.2020-049304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryke S. Steffens, Adam G. Dunn, Mathew D. Marques, Margie Danchin, Holly O. Witteman, Julie Leask

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,151,117
of 19,220,747 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#3,823
of 14,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,711
of 248,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#56
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,220,747 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.